Still Fighting Mascot

Indianz.Com. In Print.


Tim Giago: Still fighting 'Indian' mascots, ignorance and racism
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2012

Notes from Indian Country
By Tim Giago (Nanwica Kciji)
© 2012 Native American Journalists Foundation, Inc.

Twenty years ago I was on the Oprah Winfrey Show with Michael Haney and Suzanne Harjo to talk about the use of Native Americans as mascots for America’s fun and games.

It was the first time in television history that a major talk show allowed Native Americans to openly discuss why we do not appreciate our use as mascots for sports teams.

I believe that tape is still available through Harpo Productions if anyone wants to see what happened on that show. In the ensuing years no other major network has found the topic interesting enough to pursue. After all, the mascot issue affects only a very small and politically weak segment of the U.S. population and there are those dissenters even among the Indian people who defend this nefarious practice.

Full STory: http://www.indianz.com/News/2012/007190.asp 

Tim Giago, an Oglala Lakota, was born, raised and educated on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. He was the founder and first president of the Native American Journalists Association and the founder and publisher of Indian Country Today, the Lakota Times, and the Dakota/Lakota Journal. He was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard in the Class of 1991. He can be reached at najournalist@msn.com

students Triumph (mascot)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tim-giago/prescott-high-school-stud_b_566303.html

Prescott High School Students Triumph in Fight Over Indian Mascots

Why would a group of white Prescott High School students in Prescott, Wisc., fight for a bill to end the use of Native Americans as mascots, carry their concerns all of the way to the State Capitol in Madison and get Gov. James Doyle, a Democrat, to sign the bill into law on May 5?

For these dedicated students and their teacher Jeff Ryan, the victory was sweet, and it may set a precedent for other states to follow. Perhaps these high school students can teach a lesson to the petitioners on the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and the Spirit Lake Reservation in North Dakota, that to be denigrated at sporting events is not an honor. It places Native Americans on the same level as lions, tigers and bears. As the students proclaimed, Native Americans are people, not mascots.

If these non-Indian high school students can figure that out, why is Fool Bear at Standing Rock, and more than half of the tribe a Spirit Lake not listening? To be mimicked, ridiculed and aped at sporting events is not an honor and these white high school students "got it!"

The bill passed the Wisconsin Assembly by a vote of 51 - 43 and it passed the State Senate nip and tuck at 17 - 16. But, if not for the dedication and the presentations by the students at Prescott High School, the bill would have never passed. At the hearings leading up to the introduction of the bill, Native Americans from the different reservations in Wisconsin were in attendance and not a single one of them spoke out against the bill: They were all united behind the students.

As one of the tools Ryan used in his classroom to educate the students about using Native Americans as mascots, he read some of the columns I have written for the past 28 years. He and his students communicated with me all during the progression of the bill. And I was amazed to observe the dedication the students devoted to this issue. It was their school project. What started out as a lecture in November of 2008, became a law in 2010.

After the victory, Maddie Smith, one of the students, said, "It is still hard to believe that it takes legislation to ensure that different cultures are treated with respect."

Another student, Brenna Ryan, said, "We were so happy when the bill finally passed. What many people fail to realize is that this bill has been in the legislature for 16 years. There have been so many people (Native Americans) who have been working for so long to make the dream of eliminating Indian mascots and logos come true in Wisconsin and around the United States. Hopefully other states will follow what our state legislature did and once and for all decide that using race based mascots and logos in public schools does not honor Native people - it hurts them. The Native people are friends and it is time we started treating them that way."

Jack Simones talked about the things he learned from the process.
"The only way this issue can be fully understood is that you have to live outside of your own bubble and living in Wisconsin, a state with 11 Indian reservations, it makes sense that we develop that empathy and understand that the Native people of our state have a rich history that needs to be recognized, celebrated and honored appropriately in our schools and not with half-time chants and jigs at football games," Simones said.

Some of the folks that have been fighting this issue for nearly 30 years, people such as Charlene Teeters, an art instructor at the American Indian Art Institute, and Michael Haney, now deceased, a Seminole, who blanched at the Seminole Tribe's disregard for feelings of other Indians in America by continuing to allow their tribe to be used as a mascot for Florida State University, a university that has reduced their once proud name to "Noles," would have stood and cheered the courage and dedication of these Prescott High School students.

These students did not go without sharp, and oftentimes, nasty criticism from their friends and neighbors in Wisconsin.

"Why in the hell are you doing this?" was one of the most frequent questions they encountered.

As Teeters, Haney and I know, they did it because they wanted to correct a blatant wrong, a wrong that most Americans have never made the effort to understand. American Indians are human beings and not mascots for America's fun and games.

To contact the teacher and students go to jryan@prescott.k12.wi.us.

Tim Giago, an Oglala Lakota, is the publisher of Native Sun News. He was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard with the Class of 1990. His weekly column won the H. L. Mencken Award in 1985. His book Children Left Behind was awarded the Bronze Medal by Independent Book Publishers. Giago was inducted into the South Dakota Newspaper Hall of Fame in 2007. He can be reached at editor@nsweekly.com

A Little Request (mascot)

Indianz.Com. In Print.
http://www.indianz.com/News/2012/007100.asp 

Dwanna Robertson: A little request about 'Indian' mascots
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2012
Filed Under: Opinion 
More on: dwanna robertsonmascots

"With football and the fall season—which is always tough for Native folks because of the U.S.’s insistence on honoring Columbus, the awful Pocahontas Halloween costumes, and the ever-present Thanksgiving mythology of the goodness of the pilgrims and the simple-mindedness of Indigenous people—fast approaching us, I must make a request publicly. I’ve struggled over this decision, knowing many of you might judge me and say “this type of thing just isn’t done” or “that’s not how things are done around here.” I also understand my statement will have both social and political consequences for me.

The request: Think of the worst word any person could call you, whether regarding your racial, ethnic, or national heritage, your gender or sexuality, or your religion, or any other identity that you hold dear. Now, imagine hearing that word used daily all around you. Imagine seeing distorted, ugly images of that word everywhere you go. Imagine that you can’t turn on the TV, go shopping, watch movies, or even read a book without hearing or seeing what this terrible word implies because it’s that pervasive in the public discourse. Now imagine people telling you to “get over it” and that you’re being “too sensitive” when you protest its usage.

Can you empathize?"

Get the Story:
Dwanna Robertson: A Request to Everyone in Academia and Anyone Who Isn’t an American Indian as the Fall Season Approaches (Indian Country Today 9/17)

Wisconsin Law (mascot)

‎2009 WISCONSIN ACT 250
An Act to amend 118.51 (13); and to create 118.134 of the statutes; relating to: the use of race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names by school boards, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. 118.134 of the statutes is created to read:
118.134 Race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names. (1) Notwithstanding s. 118.13 and except as provided in sub. (3m), a school district resident may object to the use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name by the school board of that school district by filing a complaint with the state superintendent. If the complainant objects to the use of a nickname or team name by the school board, the state superintendent shall immediately review the complaint and determine whether the use of the nickname or team name by the school board, alone or in connection with a logo or mascot, is ambiguous as to whether it is race-based. The state superintendent shall do all of the following:
(a) Notify the school board of the receipt of the complaint and of the state superintendent's determination regarding whether the use of the nickname or team name is ambiguous as to whether it is race-based and direct the school board to submit, if applicable, any of the information under sub. (1m) (a).
(b) Except as provided in sub. (1m), schedule a contested case hearing within 45 days after the complaint is filed.
(1m) (a) The state superintendent may determine that no contested case hearing is necessary or that a hearing date may be postponed for the purpose of obtaining additional information from the school board if, no later than 10 days after being notified of the receipt of the complaint, the school board submits evidence to the state superintendent that demonstrates all of the following:
1. The nickname, logo, mascot, or team name that is used by the school board and that is the basis of the complaint is a reference to or depiction or portrayal of or the name of a specific, federally recognized, American Indian tribe.
2. The federally recognized American Indian tribe under subd. 1. has granted approval to the school board to refer to or depict or portray the tribe in a nickname, logo, or mascot or to use the name of the tribe as a team name in the specific manner used by the school board and has not rescinded that approval.
3. The use of the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name that has been approved by the tribe as provided in subd. 2. is the use to which the school district resident objects in the complaint filed under sub. (1).
(b) If the state superintendent does any of the following, the state superintendent shall notify the school district resident who filed the complaint under sub. (1) and the school board of his or her decision in writing:
1. Determines that a contested case hearing is not necessary. A decision under this subdivision is subject to judicial review under ch. 227.
2. Postpones a hearing date as provided in par. (a).
(2) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), at the hearing, the school board has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name does not promote discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping, as defined by the state superintendent by rule.
(b) 1. Except as provided in subd. 2., if the state superintendent determined under sub. (1) that the use of a nickname or team name by a school board is ambiguous as to whether it is race-based, the use of the nickname or team name by the school board shall be presumed to be not race-based and at the hearing the school district resident who filed the complaint under sub. (1) has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the use of the nickname or team name by the school board promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping, as defined by the state superintendent by rule.
2. If the state superintendent determined under sub. (1) that the use of a nickname or team name by a school board is ambiguous as to whether it is race-based but that the use of the nickname or team name in connection with a logo or mascot is race-based, at the hearing the school board has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the use of the nickname or team name in connection with the logo or mascot does not promote discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping, as defined by the state superintendent by rule.
(3) (a) The state superintendent shall issue a decision and order within 45 days after the hearing. If the state superintendent finds that the use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name does not promote discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping, the state superintendent shall dismiss the complaint. Except as provided in par. (b), if the state superintendent finds that the use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping, the state superintendent shall order the school board to terminate its use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name within 12 months after issuance of the order.
(b) 1. In this paragraph, "extenuating circumstances" includes circumstances in which the costs of compliance with an order issued under par. (a) pose an undue financial burden on the school district and circumstances in which the work or the requirements for bidding a contract to complete the work required to bring the school district into compliance with the order issued under par. (a) cannot be completed within 12 months after the issuance of the order.
2. a. If, at the hearing under sub. (2) or after a decision and order have been issued under par. (a), the school board presents evidence to the state superintendent that extenuating circumstances render full compliance with the decision and order within 12 months after the issuance of that decision and order impossible or impracticable, the state superintendent may issue an order to extend the time within which the school board must terminate its use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. Except as provided in subd. 2. b., the extension may not exceed 24 months and shall apply only to those portions of the decision and order to which extenuating circumstances apply.
b. The state superintendent may extend the time granted to a school board under subd. 2. a. if the school board presents evidence to the state superintendent that compliance with a portion of the decision and order issued under par. (a) may be accomplished through a regularly scheduled maintenance program and that the cost of compliance with that portion of the decision and order exceeds $5,000. The extension granted under this subd. 2. b. may not exceed 96 months and applies only to that portion of the decision and order with which compliance will be accomplished through the regularly scheduled maintenance program and that costs more than $5,000.
(c) Decisions of the state superintendent under this subsection are subject to judicial review under ch. 227.
(3m) A pupil attending a public school in a nonresident school district under s. 118.51 may not file a complaint under sub. (1) in which the pupil objects to the use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name by the school board of the nonresident school district.
(4) The state superintendent shall promulgate rules necessary to implement and administer this section.
(5) Any school board that uses a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name in violation of sub. (3) shall forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $1,000. Each day of use of the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name in violation of sub. (3) constitutes a separate violation.
Section 2. 118.51 (13) of the statutes is amended to read:
118.51 (13) Rights and privileges of nonresident pupils. A Except as provided in s. 118.134 (3m), a pupil attending a public school in a nonresident school district under this section has all of the rights and privileges of pupils residing in that school district and is subject to the same rules and regulations as pupils residing in that school district.
Section 3. Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) The department of public instruction shall submit in proposed form the rules required under section 118.134 (4) of the statutes, as created by this act, to the legislative council staff under section 227.15 (1) of the statutes no later than the first day of the 6th month beginning after the effective date of this subsection.
(2) Using the procedure under section 227.24 of the statutes, the department of public instruction may promulgate rules required under section 118.134 (4) of the statutes, as created by this act, for the period before the effective date of the rules submitted under subsection (1), but not to exceed the period authorized under section 227.24 (1) (c) and (2) of the statutes. Notwithstanding section 227.24 (1) (a), (2) (b), and (3) of the statutes, the department is not required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this subsection as an emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated under this subsection.

http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2009/related/acts/250

California Student Discrimination (mascot)

Duty to Protect Students

Local Educational Agencies responsibilty to students.


Access to quality education is a fundamental right of every student and is fully guaranteed and protected by the California Constitution. Education plays a central role in our society and numerous laws are designed to promote equality in educational opportunities and to safeguard all students from discriminatory practices in public schools.

The duty to protect children in the public schools from discrimination, harassment, intimidation and bullying is the responsibility of the local education agency (LEA). California Education Code (EC) Section 200 et seq., is a comprehensive statutory scheme, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of various protected groups. Specifically, Education Code Section 220 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crimes as described in Penal Code Section 422.55.

At a minimum, LEAs are to have taken the following steps:

·       Adopt a policy that prohibits discrimination and harassment, intimidation, and bullying based on the characteristics set forth in the Penal Code Section 422.55 and Education Code Section 220. The policy shall include a statement that it applies to all acts related to school activity or school attendance within a school under the jurisdiction of the superintendent of the school district. In addition, the policy is to require that school personnel take immediate steps to intervene when he or she witnesses an act of discrimination, harassment, intimidation or bullying and when it is safe to do so. (Education Code sections 201, 234.1[a] and 48900; California Code of Regulations, Title 5, [5 CCR] sections 4900, 4902, and 4950.)

·       Adopted and implemented a complaint process to receive, investigate, and resolve allegations of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying based on any of the actual or perceived characteristics contained in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code and Section 220; and shall include, but not limited, to the following: (Education Code sections 234.1[b] and 260; 5 CCR sections 4621 and 4960[a])

o   A timeline for the investigation and resolution of complaints of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or bullying that all schools under the jurisdiction of the district will follow.

o   Provide an appeal process to the complainant should he or she disagree with the resolution of the complaint.

o   All forms created relative to this process shall be translated pursuant to Section 48985.

·       Identified the person in the LEA responsible for implementation of the discrimination and harassment policy and the person responsible for investigating complaints, as well as ensuring compliance with Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 4900) of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 200). (Education Code Section 234.1(g); 5 CCR sections 4621(b) and 4961).

·       Publicized information annually to parents, and students, employees, agents of the governing board and general public regarding discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying policies and complaint procedures and how to contact the person responsible for implementation. This information is to be translated according to Section 48985. (Education Code sections 234.1[c], 35291, 48980[a] and [g]; 5 CCR sections 4622 and 4960[b]).

·       Adopted curriculum and instructional methods and materials, and electronic communication policies that promote a safe environment free of discrimination and harassment. (Education Code sections 233[b][1]; 241; 32261 and).

·       Investigated all allegations of discrimination and implemented effective corrective actions whenever necessary and appropriate; maintain documentation of complaints and their resolution for a minimum of one review cycle; and ensure that complainants are protected from retaliation and the identify remains confidential. (Education Code sections 234.1[b][e][f] 260; 5 CCR sections 4621 and 4962.)

·       Posted policies prohibiting discrimination, harassment, intimidation and bullying in all schools and offices, which include staff lounges and student government meeting rooms. (Education Code Section 234.1[d]).

Discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying of students based on their protected status can have a profound and prolonged adverse effect on the students’ ability to benefit from public education and maximize their potential. The responsibility to protect all students rests primarily with the LEAs under numerous laws set forth above.

Therefore, all LEAs are urged to review their discrimination policies and complaint procedures, and ensure that they are consistent with current laws, adequately disseminated, and fully implemented.

Nondiscrimination In Public Schools Brochure (DOC; Posted 03-Jul-2012)

Oregon Administrative Rule (mascot)

OAR 581-021-0047
Prohibits public schools from using Native American mascots

(1) As used in this section:

(a) “Native American mascot” means a name, symbol or image that depicts or refers to an American Indian Tribe, individual, custom or tradition that is used by a public school as a mascot, nickname, logo, letterhead or team name.

(b) “Public school” means a school or program operated by a school district, education service district or pubic charter school.

(2) To ensure that all public schools are in compliance with ORS 659.850 which prohibits discrimination in public schools, on or after July 1, 2017, the use of any Native American mascot by a public school is prohibited.

(3)(a) The prohibition under this section includes a prohibition on the use of team names such as “Redskins,” “Savages,” “Indians,” “Indianettes,” “Chiefs,” Chieftains,” and “Braves.”

(b) A public school may continue to use the team name “Warriors” as long as it is not combined with a symbol or image that depicts or refers to an American Indian Tribe, individual, custom or tradition.

(c) A public school may continue to use a mascot that may be associated with Native American culture, custom or tradition if the mascot depicts an animal or other image that is not a person. Examples of such mascots include team names and images such as the “Thunderbirds”, “White Buffalo” and “Eagles.”

(4) Nothing in this rule shall be construed to prohibit a public school from:

(a) Displaying art work, historical exhibits or other cultural educational exhibits or conducting educational programs related to Native Americans as long as the display or program is not associated with a Native American mascot;

(b) Honoring the contributions of Native Americans by naming a school, building or program after a Native American. (5) Each school district, education service district or sponsor of a public charter school shall notify:

(a) On or before January 1, 2013, the Department of Education if any school operated by the district or sponsor uses a Native American Mascot; and

(b) On or before July 1, 2017, the Department of Education when a new mascot is adopted for the public school.

(6) The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall find any school district, education service district or public charter school that violates this section to be in noncompliance with the discrimination prohibitions under ORS 659.855. Pursuant to ORS 659.855, the Superintendent may immediately withhold all or part of state funding from the school district, education service district or public charter school.

Stat. Auth. ORS 326.051, 659.850 and 659.855

Stat. Implemented: ORS 326.051, 338.115, 659.850 and 659.855

Not For Sport (mascot)

Not for Sport

Barbara Munson

http://www.tolerance.org/magazine/number-15-spring-1999/not-sport

Number 15: Spring 1999

As long as "Indian" team names, mascots and logos remain a part of school athletic programs, both Native and non-Native children are being taught to tolerate and perpetuate stereotyping and racism. I would like to point out some common misunderstandings on this issue and suggest constructive ways to address them.

In April 1991 when my daughter Christine wrote a letter to her principal about her high school's "Indian" mascot and logo, I did not realize that the issue would lead our family to activism on the state and national level. Whether the problem surfaces in New York state; Los Angeles County; Tacoma, Wash.; or Medford, Wis., I have found that it is framed by the same questions and themes.

"We have always been proud of our 'Indians.'"
Most communities are proud of their high school athletic teams, yet school traditions involving Native American imagery typically reflect little pride in or knowledge of Native cultures. These traditions have taken the trappings of Native cultures onto the athletic field where young people have played at being "Indian." Over time, and with practice, generations of children in these schools have come to believe that their "Indian" identity is more than pretending.

"We are honoring Indians; you should feel honored."
Native people are saying that they don't feel honored by this symbolism. We experience it as no less than a mockery of our cultures. We see objects sacred to us -- such as the drum, eagle feathers, face painting and traditional dress -- being used not in sacred ceremony, or in any cultural setting, but in another culture's game.

Among the many ways Indian people express honor are: by giving an eagle feather, which also carries great responsibility; by singing an honor song at a powwow or other ceremony; by showing deference toward elders, asking them to share knowledge and experience with us or to lead us in prayer; by avoiding actions that would stifle the healthy development of our children.

While Indian nations have the right to depict themselves any way they choose, many tribal schools are examining their own uses of Indian logos and making changes. Native American educators, parents and students are realizing that, while they may treat a depiction of an Indian person with great respect, such respect is not necessarily going to be accorded to their logo in the mainstream society.

"Why is an attractive depiction of an Indian warrior just as offensive as an ugly caricature?"
Both depictions uphold stereotypes. Both firmly place Indian people in the past, separate from our contemporary cultural experience. It is difficult, at best, to be heard in the present when someone is always suggesting that your real culture only exists in museums. The logos keep us marginalized and are a barrier to our contributing here and now.

Depictions of mighty warriors of the past emphasize a tragic part of our history; focusing on wartime survival, they ignore the strength and beauty of our cultures during times of peace. Many Indian cultures view life as a spiritual journey filled with lessons to be learned from every experience and from every living being. Many cultures put high value on peace, right action and sharing.

"We never intended the logo to cause harm."
That no harm was intended when the logos were adopted may be true. It is also true that we Indian people are saying that the logos are harmful to our cultures, and especially to our children, in the present. When someone says you are hurting them by your action, then the harm becomes intentional if you persist.

"Aren't you proud of your warriors?"
Yes, we are proud of the warriors who fought to protect our cultures from forced removal and systematic genocide and to preserve our lands from the greed of others. We are proud, and we don't want them demeaned by being "honored" in a sports activity on a playing field.

Indian men are not limited to the role of warrior; in many of our cultures a good man is learned, gentle, patient, wise and deeply spiritual. In present time as in the past, our men are also sons and brothers, husbands, uncles, fathers and grandfathers. Contemporary Indian men work in a broad spectrum of occupations, wear contemporary clothes, and live and love just as men from other cultural backgrounds do.

The depictions of Indian "braves," "warriors" and "chiefs" also ignore the roles of women and children. Many Indian Nations are both matrilineal and child-centered. Indian cultures identify women with the Creator, because of their ability to bear children, and with the Earth, which is Mother to us all. In most Indian cultures the highest value is given to children -- they are closest to the Creator and they embody the future.

"This logo issue is just about political correctness."
Using the term "political correctness" to describe the attempts of concerned Native American parents, educators and leaders to remove stereotypes from the public schools trivializes a survival issue. Systematic genocide over four centuries has decimated more than 95 percent of the indigenous population of the Americas. Today, the average life expectancy of Native American males is 45 years. The teen suicide rate among Native people is several times higher than the national average. Stereotypes, ignorance, silent inaction and even naive innocence damage and destroy individual lives and whole cultures. Racism kills.

"What if we drop derogatory comments and clip art and adopt pieces of 'real' Indian culture, like powwows and sacred songs?"
Though well-intended, these solutions are culturally naive and would exchange one pseudo-culture for another. Powwows are religious as well as social gatherings that give Native American people the opportunity to express our various cultures and strengthen our sense of Native community. To parody such ceremonial gatherings for the purpose of cheering on the team at homecoming would compound the current offensiveness. Similarly, bringing Native religions onto the secular playing field through songs of tribute to the "Great Spirit" or Mother Earth would only heighten the mockery of Native religions that we now see in the use of drums and feathers.

"We are helping you preserve your culture."
The responsibility for the continuance of our cultures falls to Native people. We accomplish this by surviving, living and thriving; and, in so doing, we pass on to our children our stories, traditions, religions, values, arts and languages. We sometimes do this important work with people from other cultural backgrounds, but they do not and cannot continue our cultures for us. Our ancestors did this work for us, and we continue to carry the culture for the generations to come. Our cultures are living cultures -- they are passed on, not "preserved."

"Why don't community members understand the need to change; isn't it a simple matter of respect?"
On one level, yes. But in some communities, people have bought into local myths and folklore presented as accurate historical facts. Sometimes these myths are created or preserved by local industry. Also, over the years, athletic and school traditions grow up around the logos. These athletic traditions can be hard to change when much of a community's ceremonial and ritual life, as well as its pride, becomes tied to high school athletic activities.

Finally, many people find it difficult to grasp a different cultural perspective. Not being from an Indian culture, they find it hard to understand that things that are not offensive to themselves might be offensive or even harmful to someone who is from a Native culture. Respecting a culture different from the one you were raised in requires some effort -- interaction, listening, observing and a willingness to learn.

We appreciate the courage, support and, sometimes, the sacrifice of all who stand with us by speaking out against the continued use of "Indian" logos. When you advocate for the removal of these logos, you are strengthening the spirit of tolerance and justice in your community; you are modeling for all our children thoughtfulness, courage and respect for self and others. 

Sample Letter (Please Personalize)





A community group is lobbying to reinstate the banned mascot.--THIS ITEM ON THE SCHOOL BOARD AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 2012.  
If you would like to contact the District Superintendent and school board please see below:

Del Norte County Unified School District
301 West Washington Blvd. 
Crescent City, CA 95531
707-464-6141

Don Olson
County and District Superintendent
(707) 464-0200

Frances Costello, Board President 

Jim Maready, Vice President/Clerk

Don McArthur, Board Member
 

Lori Cowan, Board Member

Jennifer England, Board Member 

The issue is before the School Board at their September 15 meeting.  Please write them to share your opinion on the mascot issue.

Sample Letter Attached 

(Please insert your own wording and feelings or experiences you or your children have had with either racism or negative impacts of the Mascot as this makes a MUCH more powerful statement rather than just signing the sample and sending it in).