Christopher Columbus and the Indian by Howard Zinn
[Howard Zinn is an author and lecturer. His most noted work,
from which this selection is excerpted, is A People's History of the United
States.]
Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder, emerged
from their villages onto the island's beaches and swam out to get a closer look
at the strange big boat. When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying
swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food,
water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log:
"They... brought us parrots and balls of cotton and
spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and
hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned.... They were
well-built, with good bodies and handsome features.... They do not bear arms,
and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and
cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of
cane.... They would make fine servants.... With fifty men we could subjugate
them all and make them do whatever we want."
These Arawaks of the Bahama Islands were much like Indians
on the mainland, who were remarkable (European observers were to say again and
again) for their hospitality, their belief in sharing. These traits did not
stand out in the Europe of the Renaissance, dominated as it was by the religion
of popes, the government of kings, the frenzy for money that marked Western
civilization and its first messenger to the Americas, Christopher Columbus.
Columbus wrote: "As
soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some
of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me
information of whatever there is in these parts." The information that
Columbus wanted most was: Where is the gold?
The Indians, Columbus reported, "are so naive and so
free with their possessions that no one who has not witnessed them would
believe it. When you ask for something they have, they never say no. To the
contrary, they offer to share with anyone...." He concluded his report by
asking for a little help from their Majesties, and in return he would bring
them from his next voyage "as much gold as they need . . . and as many
slaves as they ask." He was full of religious talk: "Thus the eternal
God, our Lord, gives victory to those who follow His way over apparent
impossibilities."
Because of Columbus's exaggerated report and promises, his
second expedition was given seventeen ships and more than twelve hundred men.
The aim was clear: slaves and gold. They went from island to island in the
Caribbean, taking Indians as captives. But as word spread of the Europeans'
intent they found more and more empty villages. On Haiti, they found that the
sailors left behind at Fort Navidad had been killed in a battle with the
Indians, after they had roamed the island in gangs looking for gold, taking
women and children as slaves for sex and labor.
Now, from his base on Haiti, Columbus sent expedition after
expedition into the interior. They found no gold fields, but had to fill up the
ships returning to Spain with some kind of dividend. In the year 1495, they
went on a great slave raid, rounded up fifteen hundred Arawak men, women, and
children, put them in pens guarded by Spaniards and dogs, then picked the five
hundred best specimens to load onto ships. Of those five hundred, two hundred
died en route. The rest arrived alive in Spain and were put up for sale by the
archdeacon of the town, who reported that, although the slaves were "naked
as the day they were born," they showed "no more embarrassment than
animals." Columbus later wrote: "Let us in the name of the Holy
Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold."
But too many of the slaves died in captivity. And so
Columbus, desperate to pay back dividends to those who had invested, had to
make good his promise to fill the ships with gold. In the province of Cicao on
Haiti, where he and his men imagined huge gold fields to exist, they ordered
all persons fourteen years or older to collect a certain quantity of gold every
three months. When they brought it, they were given copper tokens to hang
around their necks. Indians found without a copper token had their hands cut
off and bled to death.
The Indians had been given an impossible task. The only gold
around was bits of dust garnered from the streams. So they fled, were hunted
down with dogs, and were killed.
Trying to put together an army of resistance, the Arawaks
faced Spaniards who had armor, muskets, swords, horses. When the Spaniards took
prisoners they hanged them or burned them to death. Among the Arawaks, mass
suicides began, with cassava poison. Infants were killed to save them from the
Spaniards. In two years, through murder, mutilation, or suicide, half of the
250,000 Indians on Haiti were dead.
When it became clear that there was no gold left, the
Indians were taken as slave labor on huge estates, known later as encomiendas.
They were worked at a ferocious pace, and died by the thousands. By the year
1515, there were perhaps fifty thousand Indians left. By 1550, there were five
hundred. A report of the year 1650 shows none of the original Arawaks or their
descendants left on the island.
The chief source-and, on many matters the only source of
information about what happened on the islands after Columbus came is Bartolome
de las Casas, who, as a young priest, participated in the conquest of Cuba. For
a time he owned a plantation on which Indian slaves worked, but he gave that up
and became a vehement critic of Spanish cruelty. In Book Two of his History of
the Indies, Las Casas (who at first urged replacing Indians by black slaves,
thinking they were stronger and would survive, but later relented when he saw
the effects on blacks) tells about the treatment of the Indians by the Spaniards.
It is a unique account and deserves to be quoted at length:
"Endless testimonies . . . prove the mild and pacific
temperament of the natives.... But our work was to exasperate, ravage, kill,
mangle and destroy; small wonder, then, if they tried to kill one of us now and
then.... The admiral, it is true, was blind as those who came after him, and he
was so anxious to please the King that he committed irreparable crimes against
the Indians..."
Las Casas tells how the Spaniards "grew more conceited
every day" and after a while refused to walk any distance. They "rode
the backs of Indians if they were in a hurry" or were carried on hammocks
by Indians running in relays. "In this case they also had Indians carry
large leaves to shade them from the sun and others to fan them with goose
wings."
Total control led to total cruelty. The Spaniards
"thought nothing of knifing Indians by tens and twenties and of cutting
slices off them to test the sharpness of their blades." Las Casas tells
how "two of these so-called Christians met two Indian boys one day, each
carrying a parrot; they took the parrots and for fun beheaded the boys."
The Indians' attempts to defend themselves failed. And when
they ran off into the hills they were found and killed. So, Las Casas reports.
"they suffered and died in the mines and other labors in desperate
silence, knowing not a soul in the world to whom they could tun for help."
He describes their work in the mines:
"... mountains are stripped from top to bottom and
bottom to top a thousand times; they dig, split rocks, move stones, and carry
dirt on their backs to wash it in the rivers, while those who wash gold stay in
the water all the time with their backs bent so constantly it breaks them; and
when water invades the mines, the most arduous task of all is to dry the mines
by scooping up pansful of water and throwing it up outside....
After each six or eight months' work in the mines, which was
the time required of each crew to dig enough gold for melting, up to a third of
the men died. While the men were sent many miles away to the mines, the wives
remained to work the soil, forced into the excruciating job of digging and
making thousands of hills for cassava plants.
Thus husbands and wives were together only once every eight
or ten months and when they met they were so exhausted and depressed on both
sides . . . they ceased to procreate. As for the newly born, they died early
because their mothers, overworked and famished, had no milk to nurse them, and
for this reason, while I was in Cuba, 7000 children died in three months. Some
mothers even drowned their babies from sheer desperation.... In this way,
husbands died in the mines, wives died at work, and children died from lack of
milk . . . and in a short time this land which was so great, so powerful and
fertile ... was depopulated.... My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to
human nature, and now I tremble as I write...."
When he arrived on Hispaniola in 1508, Las Casas says,
"there were 60,000 people living on this island, including the Indians; so
that from 1494 to 1508, over three million people had perished from war,
slavery, and the mines. Who in future generations will believe this? I myself
writing it as a knowledgeable eyewitness can hardly believe it...."
Thus began the history, five hundred years ago, of the
European invasion of the Indian settlements in the Americas. That beginning,
when you read Las Casas--even if his figures are exaggerations (were there 3
million Indians to begin with, as he says, or less than a million, as some
historians have calculated, or 8 million as others now believe?) is conquest,
slavery, death. When we read the history books given to children in the United
States, it all starts with heroic adventure--there is no bloodshed-and Columbus
Day is a celebration.
The treatment of heroes (Columbus) and their victims (the
Arawaks) the quiet acceptance of conquest and murder in the name of progress-is
only one aspect of a certain approach to history, in which the past is told
from the point of view of governments, conquerors, diplomats, leaders. It is as
if they, like Columbus, deserve universal acceptance, as if they-the Founding
Fathers, Jackson, Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, Kennedy, the leading members of
Congress, the famous Justices of the Supreme Court-represent the nation as a
whole. The pretense is that there really is such a thing as "the United
States," subject to occasional conflicts and quarrels, but fundamentally a
community of people with common interests. It is as if there really is a
"national interest" represented in the Constitution, in territorial
expansion, in the laws passed by Congress, the decisions of the courts, the
development of capitalism, the culture of education and the mass media.
2 Howard Zinn, "Columbus, the Indians, and Human
Progress," A People's History of the United States
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/Columbus_PeoplesHx.html