How 'Indian' mascots oppress (mascot)

http://www.nativecircle.com/mascots.htm

Let me begin by saying that the fact that I even have to have a page on my 
site for this is a crying shame.  These racist images and names, offensive 
to American Indian people, should have been long gone by now.  Yet, here 
they are, still tomahawk-chopping us with racism in sports and media while 
they grin at us like that red-faced racist 'chief wahoo'.  I get a bit sick and 
tired of trying to explain what is racist about these names and mascots. 
I am in no way a fanatic about political correctness, and besides, that is not 
what this is about.  It is about racism on a national scale, and it must stop.

Point in Case....
Daniel Snyder, owner of the NFL team the Washington R[acist]s, was made
acutely aware, back when he purchased the team, of the fact that the team's
name is a nasty racial slur which is just as ugly as the "N" word.  He chose to
do nothing, and by doing so, announced to the world that he was a racist,
because everyone with a brain knows that "inaction to racism is racism".
Message to Daniel Snyder:  I don't hate you, but I do hate that it seems you
care more about making a buck than you do about doing what is right.  Sure,
it would take some courage, and certainly some investment to, at long last,
rid the team representing the nation's capitol of its racist name, but hey, if
you need advice on how to do it, you can always call Stanford University!

So....
If you belong to a school or pro franchise that endorses racism toward 
Indian people with its name, logo, and/or mascot, I ask you to put on your 
common sense cap, read this page, then do something about it.  It is long 
overdue for this form of racism toward Indian people to stop.  I long for the 
day when we can remove this page from my website....  May it come soon.
(Been here now for over 11 years....  still waiting.......)

Does it really need to be explained why the "N" word is not
used as the name for a sports team?   Probably not.  And does
it need to be explained why using racist caricatures of other
minority groups as a team 'mascot' would be unthinkable?
Again, probably not.  These things are now common sense
for most sensible people.  Yet, for reasons deeply ingrained
in American culture, First Nations people are expected to
explain why certain words and images are racist to us!
And as if that weren't enough of an insult, the reaction we
often get from people who have had these issues brought to
their attention is to either do nothing to change it, or worse,
to actually argue with us in defense of racism!!  Unbelievable!

And so....  Here I go again, with the "explanation"....

Let's take a look at sports team names in general.  There are
only 
three categories that nearly all sports team names fall into. 
1. Animals  2. Objects  3. 'Professions'

Some examples: 
ANIMALS 
Eagles, Bears, Falcons, Lions, Tigers, Ravens, Bulls, 
Wolverines, Cardinals, Dolphins, Ducks, Jaguars etc.

OBJECTS 
Pistons, Bullets, Rockets, Suns, Jets, Red Sox, White 
Sox, Stars, Rockies etc.

PROFESSIONS 
Packers, Kings, Steelers, Spartans, Buccaneers, 
Vikings, 49ers, Cowboys, Rangers, Lakers etc.

Obviously there are exceptions.  Such as: 
Bills (named after Buffalo Bill), Redwings (could be an object 
or an animal), Titans (a large giant), Rockies (a mountain) etc.

But most sports team names fit into the 3 categories.
Now, a list of 
'Indian' team names/mascots.... 
Chiefs, Braves, Indians, Redsk**s, Fighting Illini, Chippewas, 
Savages, Seminoles, Warriors, Redmen, Chieftains etc.

So which category do these fit into?

Before we answer that, it needs to be fully understood
that some of these so-called 'Indian' sports team names
are actually racial slurs.  Obviously, a racial slur is an
completely unacceptable choice for a sports team name.

Here is a list of some of the racial slurs
which are still used as sports team names:
Savages
I don't think this one needs a whole lot of explaining.  Indian people are not beasts, 
and we never were.  But we were considered to be 'uncivilized', bloodthisty, demon
'savages' by european invaders
 merely because our societies were foreign to them.

Squaws
This is a word that has been used to refer to Indian women.  Used as a name for many parks, 
valleys, mountains etc.  The term 'squaw' is VERY offensive to Indian women.  The term was
taken from an Algonquin word which made reference to female genitalia.  The word was
taken and twisted by those european immigrants who would rape Indian women.  They used
the term in much the same way the "C" word is used today, as a denigrating term to women.

Redsk**s
Used as a name for many sports teams, this word is offensive by its very nature.  In it's 
origin, it refers to the bloody scalps of Indian children, women and men that were sold for 
bounties aside animal skins in the USA.  At this sad period in american history, Indians 
young and old, male and female, were hunted like animals by bounty hunters.  They were
killed, and then scalped.
  When these bounty hunters would come to the trading post, they
would receive payment for their deer-skins,
 their, beaver-skins, their raccoon-skins, and
their red-skins. It is sickening that
 this horrifying word is still used as a sports team name.

Braves
This is a word that has been used to denigrate Indian men.  It dehumanizes the Indian male
and equates him to
 something less than human.  The terms 'buck' and 'doe' were also used
by early european immigrants as a way to patronize Indian men and women.  As you can see,
they also infer that the Indian person is in some way inhuman.  We are
 men, NOT 'braves'....

Chiefs
This is a word that is commonly given as a nickname which insults Indian 
men.  The cultural equivelant would be to nickname all white men 'Prez' or 'King'. 
The term 'chief' itself is incorrect.  Our leaders were never 'chiefs', but headmen,
or clan mothers, and so on.  Not 'chiefs'.
  Our leaders were highly disrespected by 
the USA.  So calling someone 'Chief', is just a way to continue that disrespect....

So having addressed that, which category do these
so-called 'Indian' sports team names fit into?
Animals?  Objects?  Professions?

The answer of course, is simple, none 
of the above!  These names/mascots fall into the 
category: RACIAL.  It  may be argued that the 
names 'Chiefs', 'Warriors' and 'Chieftains' fit 
into the 'PROFESSIONS' category.  Allow me to 
explain why they don't.

When you think of a 'warrior', what's the first image that pops 
into your mind?  How about a 'chief' or a 'chieftain'?  These 
3 terms are nearly always applied to American Indian people. 
Take some time to investigate the antics and images of teams 
that use these names/mascots.  I have yet to find one team 
using one of these names that isn't up to their ears in the use 
of highly offensive racially geared antics and images.  It is 
due to this strong racially offensive connection that I tie 
these 3 team names/mascots to the 'RACIAL' category.

American Indians are a race of people, not 
ANIMALS, OBJECTS, or 'PROFESSIONS'. 
So how does this equate to racial oppression? 
Allow me to explain.... 



Let me begin by addressing the obvious first.  The 
terms 'reds**n' and 'brave' are, by their definition 
alone, racial slurs.  'Reds**n' is a historic word 
which came into use during the times when Indian 
men, women and children were hunted like animals 
and murdered, then scalped.  These scalps or 
'redsk**s' were then turned in for a bounty.  The 
term 'brave' is a demeaning word used for many 
centuries in reference to Indian men.  It stems 
from the once popular belief that Indians were 
less than human.  Indian men were also referred
to as 'bucks', and Indian women as 'does.'  These
terms dehumanize and insult.  The continued use of
these demeaning words leads me to believe that this 
'less than human' belief still exists today....

These 'Indian' mascots/team names oppress Indian 
people.  They oppress because they continue in the 
use of extreme negative stereotypical antics, words 
and images.  Antics like the 'tomahawk-chop', mock 
'Indian war-chants', non-Indians painting their faces 
and dressing-up like 'Indians', mascots performing 
mock 'Indian' dances or throwing fiery spears etc..

Indian children cannot possibly look at a stadium full of 
thousands of people mocking their ethnicity and making 
fun of their traditions and feel good about being Indian.  This 
is what 'Indian mascots' do.  They glorify all the stupid old 
stereotypes and steal the pride our children could have in 
the beauty of their race.  They insult the entire Indian race.

Insulting an entire race.... the very real definition of racism.... 


RACIAL should not be a sports team name/mascot 
category.  Did you know that Irish people, not so 
long ago, fought Notre Dame about the harmful 
use of the name 'Fighting Irish'?  So you see, this 
issue is not exclusively an Indian issue.  Many 
thousands of institutions, grade-school, collegiate 
and professional, have made the decision to do 
the right thing and remove their RACIAL names 
in exchange for names that fall into the three 
categories above.  It is the morally right choice.

We are people.  Not objects for America's 
amusement.  We have been idealized, demonized 
and romanticized by America long enough.  It must 
stop.  We are NOT 'honored'.  We are DIS-honored 
and DISrespected.  Treat us as people, not as 
infallible, mighty, powerful, glamorous romantic 
'warriors' straight out of a hollywood fantasy movie. 
We're just PEOPLE.  And we demand to be treated so.


"I believe that the hidden agenda behind Indian mascots 
and logos is about cultural, spiritual, and intellectual 
exploitation.  It's an issue of power and control.  These 
negative ethnic images are driven by those that want 
to define other ethnic groups and control their 
images.  To me, power and control is the ability to 
make you believe that someone's truth is the absolute 
truth.  Furthermore, it's the ability to define a reality 
and to get other people to affirm that reality as if it 
were their own.  As long as such negative mascots 
and logos remain within the arena of school 
activities, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous 
children are learning to tolerate racism in schools."

                Excerpt from an article by Dr. Cornel Pewewardy 
                                                                    Comanche/Kiowa


It is my hope that these honest words have touched 
your heart and made common sense to you.  Racism 
is racism, no matter how 'attractive' one makes it 
look.  Pilamaye (Thank you) for taking the time to 
read this material.  Stop in again, as maybe some
day you will come here, and this page will be gone!