Young native Writers Essay Contest (opportunity/education)

Full Info and submission link at: http://nativewriters.hklaw.com/

REACHING OUT TO NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH TO INSPIRE READING, STUDYING, AND HIGHER EDUCATION

The Young Native Writers Essay Contest is a writing contest for Native American high school students and is designed to encourage young Native Americans to think about the critical issues impacting their tribal communities today.

The voices that emerge from this program honor the legacy of every Native American who has ever lived. Add your words to the thousands submitted through this project - all writers receive a Certificate of Honor for their submissions.

The Holland & Knight Charitable Foundation's goal of promoting education and creating new opportunities for youth has inspired this essay contest. Partnering with Holland & Knight in this endeavor is the National Museum of the American Indian.

CCAIE, conference, workshops, powwow (information)

save the dates....

NEW  LOCAL  Thurs., March  24th, 2011.  10 am - 4:30pm  Expanding Horizons: California American Indian Civil Rights in Education. This is a free pre conference workshop with the 34th Annual California Conference on American Indian Education (CCAIE).  LOCATION: Westin LAX Hotel, 5400 West Century Blvd., Los Angeles CA 90045  CONTACT:  (800) 937-8461

 

 

NEW  LOCAL  March  24 - 26, 2011.  The 34th Annual California Conference on American Indian Education (CCAIE), “Indian Education: Strengthening Our Future by Coming Together.”  The conference will showcase 34 years of success and growth of American Indian education in California and the impact the American Indian Education Centers have had in American Indian Communities.  LOCATION: Westin LAX Hotel, 5400 West Century Blvd., Los Angeles CA 90045  CONTACT:  Irma Amaro, (707) 464-3512, Irma@ncidc.org, Rachel McBride, Rachel.4winds@sbcglobal.net, (530) 895-4212, ext. 110. http://www.aisc.ucla.edu/admin/c_n_resources/CalltoConference2011.pdf  CCAIE Powwow will be held on Saturday the 26th. Powwow Info: Phill Hale, (714) 962-6673.

Listening Session Remarks (education)

Draft remarks of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan at Town Hall/Listening Session with Tribal Officials
December 15, 2010, Washington, DC


Good morning. 

I’d like to extend a special welcome to the many tribal officials here today who have made the long trip to Washington- – it’s an honor to have you here as we get ready for tomorrow’s White House Tribal Nations Conference.

This morning, I want to discuss briefly our ongoing efforts to improve educational opportunities in Indian Country and then open the discussion for questions.  Strengthening education in Indian Country is absolutely essential not only to the long-term prosperity of tribal communities, but to our overall competitiveness and success as a nation in the twenty-first century.  

 I want to leave you with two takeaway messages today.  

First, I’m absolutely committed to improving the relationship between tribes and the Department of Education.  For too long, the federal government and our Department failed to meaningfully consult tribal leaders on policies affecting Indian Country. That is starting to change.  I am determined to forge a better balanced federal-tribal relationship based on regular and meaningful consultation.

Second, I want you to know that over the last year and a half, we’ve listened to your concerns. And we’ve heard you.  At consultations and listening sessions throughout Indian Country, our senior leadership has gotten its own education about the challenges to accelerating student achievement in your communities.   

Now, consultation alone isn’t a solution.   Now is the time for concrete action that will improve student outcomes in your communities.  That’s why we’ve begun implementing policies, with your support and guidance, to expand educational opportunities and boost student learning throughout Indian Country. 

It is no secret that the Federal government often shirked its educational obligations in Indian Country during the last 150 years.  Too many times, it failed to meet its responsibilities in the unique government-to-government relationship or fulfill its trust responsibilities. 

Instead of working with tribal leaders to improve public education, Washington has often ended up working at odds with them; instead of talking to tribal leaders about the needs of their communities, Washington has often talked at them.

In the early days, the federal government sought to eradicate Native American culture by funding harshly paternalistic boarding schools for Indian students. Then, for half-a-century, it was the policy of the federal government to assimilate Native American students. 

Only since the passage of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act in 1975, has the federal government begun to support self-determination and the preservation of Native American language and culture as federal policy.

Unfortunately, even during the last 35 years, the Federal government and this Department sometimes took a “Washington-knows-best” approach to Indian education.  Tribal leaders weren’t meaningfully consulted on decisions that affected the education of their children. Consultations were hollow gestures that created an illusion of collaboration. And tribes were not treated as full and equal partners.

Native American communities across Indian Country bear the burden of that tragic legacy.

Native American students have some of the lowest college matriculation rates and highest high school dropout rates in the country.  In a 2010 study of 12 states, the high school graduation rate among American Indian students was under 50 percent — the lowest rate among any ethnic group surveyed.  And we know that many of those students drop out even before they reach ninth grade. With graduation rates that low, it’s little wonder that nearly 25 percent of all Native Americans live in poverty

The terrible toll of those numbers became even more real to me the first time I visited a reservation.  

A year ago last May, I spent an unforgettable afternoon at the Northern Cheyenne Reservation in Lame Dear, Montana. 

I’ve seen poverty up close growing up on the South Side of Chicago, but the deprivation I saw at the reservation was even more striking. Families were living in dilapidated housing and there wasn’t enough housing for teachers. The community had a 70 percent unemployment rate—70 percent--and had been wracked with methamphetamine abuse. In six years, the high school had produced only eight college-bound graduates. Only a single student, the teachers told me, had graduated from college during the previous six years.  

Yet for all the apparent hopelessness, what struck me the most – what sticks with me--– was the hope and resolve I saw on the faces of the children I met.  These children had every reason to be pessimistic about their situation, but they weren’t.  They had every reason to give up on their future, but they hadn’t.  

It was that hope which I saw in students like Teton Magpie – who, at the time, was a freshman at Lame Deer High School.

When I visited his school to answer questions and talk with students and teachers, Teton told me that he wanted to take more demanding courses and have more mentors so that he could be the first member of his family to attend college.  Teton and other students wanted to be challenged. They were asking for higher expectations. And they were tired of adults telling them they would never make it.

I’ll never forget Teton’s composure, courage, and commitment.  That’s one reason why Teton and I have stayed in touch over the last year and a half.  And I was glad to see that the Northern Cheyenne Nation Boys and Girls Club won a highly-competitive Promise Neighborhoods planning grant to design a comprehensive cradle-to-career child development and education program for the tribe and three school districts. 

Teton’s concerns aren’t unique.  He’s no different than countless Native American youth who live in difficult circumstances but who want to be challenged, who desperately want to succeed.  It’s our job to help those children fulfill their potential.

A few days after returning from the reservation, I said at the National Press Club that if we can’t help those Native American children be successful over the next couple of years, ”I personally would have failed.”

Today, I still feel that same sense of urgency.  

We owe these children the chance at a better future-- and we know that education can provide that chance. It is the one sure path to a more equal and prosperous future for all children, no matter their background, race, or zip code.

This bedrock belief, that education can be the great equalizer, is very personal for me.  I learned that truth firsthand growing up in my mother’s after-school tutoring program in a church basement on the South Side of Chicago.  

From the time we were born, my brother, my sister, and I went to that basement almost every day.  When we were little, the older students tutored the younger kids, and as we grew up, we tutored the younger students.  Everyone knew our program was a safe haven where kids were nurtured, respected, and taught right from wrong.  Every child in her program except for my brother, my sister, and I were low-income minority students, and many of them came from challenging situations. And the dividing line between those who made it out, and those who didn’t, was whether they got an education. 

I know education can be the game-changer that breaks down the status quo of low expectations, poverty, and high unemployment in Indian Country.

The work of dramatically improving public education in your communities cannot wait.  We can never forget that children only get one chance at an education.

So the question today is:  How do we improve the system so that it accelerates achievement and attainment?  How can we ensure that students like Teton go to schools where they will acquire the skills they need to succeed in today’s knowledge economy?

These are questions that are very much part of our institutional mission at the Department. Today, more than 90 percent of Native American students attend regular public schools, instead of BIE-funded schools.

Over the last year, my senior staff and I listened to your concerns and ideas at consultations throughout Indian Country – in places like Shawnee, Oklahoma; Pine Ridge, South Dakota; Window Rock, Arizona; and others.  

Unlike in some previous administrations, senior officials have been soliciting your input in your lands--and not at the conference room at the airport hotel.

We heard your concerns about tribal sovereignty and the urgent need to expand tribal control over the education of Indian students, especially in schools located on tribal lands.

I am pleased to tell you that the Department will pursue a pilot program to enhance the role of tribal education agencies and tribes in the education of their members on an experimental basis. This pilot program would be part of our proposal to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Act, or what’s known as No Child Left Behind. It would allow a small number of Tribal Educational Agencies to enter into collaborative agreements with state educational agencies to assume responsibility for some state-level functions in administering ESEA programs. 

Under this TEA pilot program, eligible TEAs will have an opportunity to act more like state educational agencies, work closely with districts and schools located on reservations, and play a direct role in the education of their own children.  As President Obama has said, “tribes do better when they make their own decisions.” 

I would add that our ESEA reauthorization blueprint and budget reflect your input and advice in numerous ways. For example, our ESEA proposal provides greater flexibility in the use of federal funds for Native language immersion and Native language restoration programs. Other provisions greatly expand support for high-quality teacher preparation programs, including grow-your-own programs in rural areas and tribal communities.

We also heard your concerns about Indian Country’s access to funding opportunities, especially in cases of competitive awards. As a result, our Promise Neighborhoods competition included an absolute priority or separate competitive pool for applicants who proposed to serve Indian communities.

At the same time, the Department created a competitive priority in the Investing in Innovation Fund, or i3 program, for applicants serving rural areas. The i3 program had far more applicants than any program in the history of the department. But one of the 18 grantees that responded to the rural priority was the Parents as Teachers National Center, which received a grant to replicate its Family and Child Education program in 24 BIE schools.  

Overall, our budget maintains the current funding levels for Indian education programs, instead of consolidating those funds as we proposed in other areas.  Our fiscal 2011 budget proposed $104 million [dollars] in formula grants for Indian education and $23 million [dollars] in competitive grants for innovative programs to improve student outcomes, including early learning initiatives and preparing Native Americans to enter the teaching profession. 

I’m glad to see that several officials from tribal colleges are here today as well. We were excited that Congress enacted President Obama’s request for more than $275 million [dollars] for Indian school construction in the Recovery Act and an additional $300 million [dollars] for Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. 

Boosting resources is a necessary first step. But we’re also going to make sure you have a much bigger voice when it comes to education policy.  Early next year, we will create a new, permanent, senior level position within the Department of Education. And that appointee will be responsible for making sure the unique educational and cultural needs of Native American students are met.

I recognize that many challenges lie ahead in transforming education in Indian Country--and these are challenges not just for our Department but for tribal educators and leaders as well. 

We are excited about our pilot TEA project to shift some aspects of supporting schools and districts to tribal education agencies. But for those pilot projects to succeed, TEAs will need to take ownership of their expanded role. And they will need to develop more institutional capacity for overseeing tribal education, improving student learning, and preparing students for the rigors of the global economy. 

I have no illusions about undoing generations of failed policies and broken promises overnight. The educational challenges tribal communities face were generations in the making--and it will take courage, commitment, and collaboration to undo the status quo. 

Yet the scale of the challenges we face is no excuse for inaction.  Working together, we have a unique chance to get this right – to fundamentally change the way our Department engages tribal communities. Working together, we have a unique opportunity to make sure that all Native American children get a quality education and a fair shake at pursuing their dreams.

Many of the people in this room – and many more who will be at tomorrow’s conference – have worked tirelessly in pursuit of that goal.    

And so I ask you to continue the extraordinary work you’ve done on behalf of Native American communities all across the country.  With your collective will and dedication, we’ll see the day when all Native American children get the world-class education they deserve.  This country owes them nothing less.

Thank you. And now I’d like to throw the discussion open for questions.

Family & Achievement Gap (education)

ETS Achievement Gap Conference Focuses on Families and Academic Development
by Jamaal Abdul-Alim, October 19, 2010


WASHINGTON — At a time when a national debate rages over whether charter schools are better than traditional public schools in abating the achievement gap, a conference on Monday sought to refocus attention on strengthening the family.

“(Family) is a stronger correlate of achievement than any of the other factors,” said Dr. Michael Nettles, senior vice president of the Policy Evaluation and Research Center at the Educational Testing Service (ETS). The Princeton, N.J.-based ETS hosted the event titled “The Family: America’s Smallest School.”

“So the socioeconomic status and condition of people’s lives is the biggest predictor of performance on assessments and tests that are administered to gauge achievement,” Nettles said. “It’s also the biggest predictor of gaps in achievement and quality of life.”

Monday’s conference, held at the Willard InterContinental Hotel in Washington, covered a range of topics from the standpoint of how various interventions, programs and policies can better enable families from low-income and diverse socioeconomic backgrounds to get more involved in their children’s education in a way that assures better academic outcomes.

Much of the discussion focused on the benefits of providing access to quality early-childhood education to children from low-income families.

“The issue isn’t just access. The issue is quality,” said David Sciarra, executive director of the Education Law Center, a Newark, N.J.-based organization that advocates for access to an equal and adequate education under state and federal laws. “Unless programs are very high quality, we’re not going to get where we want to go. We are not going to close the achievement gap unless we decide as a matter of national policy to get all kids, particularly children in poor communities, access to the kind of programs I just described.”

But there are some areas where government interventions have had a difficult time making a difference. One such intervention is the Building Strong Families (BSF) project, begun under the Bush Administration and overseen by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Panelist Robert Wood, associate director of research and senior economist at Mathematica Policy Research, said a recent evaluation of the program found that it had little to no impact. Specifically, with few exceptions, the federal program, designed to provide “relationship-skills education” to unwed parents through weekly group sessions with trained facilitators, made virtually no difference in father involvement, whether couples stayed together or got married.

“Our results suggest that it’s hard to make this approach work,” Wood said.

Though the achievement gap involves significant numbers of African-American, Hispanic and Native American students, engaging parents and families from those groups requires a culturally specific approach, several panelists said.

“When we talk about Latinos, it’s more about family engagement than parent engagement,” said Eugene Garcia, vice president of education partnerships at Arizona State University. “Fathers and mothers are available, along with grandparents, uncles, aunts.”

He said those working with Latino families should understand the meaning of the Spanish words such as educacion and confianza. With educacion, Garcia said, it entails more than just book smarts.

“They don’t just want their children to learn reading and mathematics,” Garcia said. “They want them to be good people.”

Confianza means “trust” and implies that educators have permission and a responsibility to treat students as if they were their own children and that the students owe educators the same respect as their parents.

The idea is “you are a parent to my child,” Garcia said.

Similar to Hispanics, Native Americans also have a heavy focus on the role of the extended family in a child’s education.

“Aunts, uncles, grandparents, they all have a role to play in the development of young people,” said Dr. John Tippeconnic, director of the American Indian Leadership Program at The Pennsylvania State University. “Sometimes, that’s broken down. Education has been used as a tool to break that down,” he added, recalling that Indian boarding schools from generations past separated children from their home communities to get Native Americans to adapt to the ways of Whites.

Much of the discussion of African-Americans dealt with father engagement, or lack thereof, because of societal ills such as incarceration.

Dr. Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, a child development and education professor at Teachers College and College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University, presented data from a nearly decade-long study that showed that father involvement within unwed couples starts out strong but wanes over time because the fathers or mothers become involved with other partners and other factors. This in turn creates an instability that impacts children’s academics, such as their vocabulary scores, Brooks-Gunn said.

Brooks-Gunn called for better access to pre-K, Head Start and similar programs, although she acknowledged that research has shown the sustained impact of Head Start peters out in the primary grades.  “That’s the issue a lot of us want to look at,” she said.

Dr. Thelma Meléndez de Santa Ana, the U.S. Education Department assistant secretary for elementary and secondary education, recounted her experience in elementary school as an English language learner. Meléndez paid homage to a kindergarten teacher who made her feel welcome by helping arrange out-of-school times for her practice to English with another student. But the following school year, a different teacher placed her in a low-level reading group despite her immigrant parents’ protests. Her parents ultimately put her in another school where she was placed in the second-highest reading group.

“I wish I could tell you all parents are like that but they’re not,” Meléndez said. She said more needs to be done to make parents feel welcome and encourage them to play an active role in their children’s education.